Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • A Different Kind of Pope – Analysis by Theodore Kalmoukos
    • A Zoom Retreat on “Pride” for Clergy Wives and Widows
    • Pascha With St. John of Shanghai
    • Over 200 Entered the Church this Pascha in Hatfield, UK
    • On the Unity of the Church: An Interview with Dr. Symeon Paschalidis
    • OCA Delegation Attends Funeral of Pope Francis
    • Another Joyful Milestone at St. Vladimir’s Seminary
    • The “Chernobyl Savior” Icon
    Orthodox Christian Laity
    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube
    • Home
    • OCL
      • About OCL
      • Leadership
      • OCL News
      • OCL Publications
      • Focused Study and Research Topics
      • OCL Archives at DePaul University
    • Orthodox News & Links
      • Orthodox News Stories
      • Headlines & News Archives
      • Governance & Unity
        • Governance Top Stories
        • Governance & Unity Essays
        • Grassroots Unity in Action
      • OCL Forums
      • Orthodox Christian Laity News
      • Web Links
    • Audio & Video
      • Audio Index
      • Video Index
    • Contact
    • Make a Donation
    Orthodox Christian Laity
    You are at:Home»Orthodox News»Why Vestments? An Introduction to Liturgical Textiles of the Post-Byzantine World

    Why Vestments? An Introduction to Liturgical Textiles of the Post-Byzantine World

    0
    By Webmaster on August 3, 2015 Orthodox News, Orthodox News Top Stories
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Telegram WhatsApp Copy Link

    Source: The Metropolitan Museum of Art

    Why Vestments? An Introduction to Liturgical Textiles of the Post-Byzantine World

    by Warren T. Woodfin, Kallinikeion Assistant Professor of Art History, Queens College, City University of New York

    Why Vestments? An Introduction to Liturgical Textiles of the Post-Byzantine World Saint Nicholas, from four icons from a pair of doors (panels), possibly part of a polyptych, early 15th century. Made in Crete. Byzantine. Tempera and gold on wood; 10 13/16 × 7 3/8 x 5/16 in. (27.4 x 18.8 × 0.8 cm). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Purchase, Mary and Michael Jaharis Gift, 2013 (2013.980d)
    Saint Nicholas, from four icons from a pair of doors (panels), possibly part of a polyptych, early 15th century. Made in Crete. Byzantine. Tempera and gold on wood; 10 13/16 × 7 3/8 x 5/16 in. (27.4 x 18.8 × 0.8 cm). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Purchase, Mary and Michael Jaharis Gift, 2013 (2013.980d)

    The exhibition Liturgical Textiles of the Post-Byzantine World, now on view through November 1, 2015, presents a selection of notable liturgical vestments that communicate the continuing prestige of the Orthodox Church and its clergy in the centuries following the fifteenth-century fall of Byzantine Constantinople to the Ottoman Turks. From a strictly theological viewpoint, vestments are hardly a necessity for Christian worship. Liturgical scholars are largely in agreement that for the first several centuries of Christianity’s existence, its clergy officiated at services wearing the normal “street dress” of the Roman world. Only gradually did these items of clothing take on special significance as liturgical vestments, to be worn only during worship.

    The tunic—worn by virtually everyone in Late Antiquity, regardless of age, rank, or gender—was stylized to become the sticharion, or alb; while the outer, poncho-like cloak, the Roman paenula, became the vestment known in the West as the chasuble (from casula, “little house”) and in the Greek-speaking East as the phelonion. By the fourth century, special stoles of office were added for the deacon and for the bishop (the orarion andomophorion, respectively), while the priest’s stole, the epitrachelion, also worn by bishops, appears in textual records only several centuries later.

    Tunic with Dionysian ornament, probably 5th century. Egypt, Akhmim (former Panopolis). Coptic. Linen, wool; plain weave, tapestry weave; L. 72 1/16 in. (183 cm), W. 53 1/8 in. (135 cm). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Gift of Edward S. Harkness, 1926 (26.9.8)
    Tunic with Dionysian ornament, probably 5th century. Egypt, Akhmim (former Panopolis). Coptic. Linen, wool; plain weave, tapestry weave; L. 72 1/16 in. (183 cm), W. 53 1/8 in. (135 cm). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Gift of Edward S. Harkness, 1926 (26.9.8)

    The history of liturgical vestments in the later centuries of the Byzantine Empire is one of increasing distinctions. Not only did vestments, as before, differentiate the clergy from the laity and distinguish orders within the clergy (bishops, priests, deacons, subdeacons, etc.), but new additions to the repertoire of vestments helped to distinguish rank within these clerical orders. Hence, from the eleventh century onward, metropolitans and other bishops of high rank were entitled to wear the polystavrion phelonion (as seen in Saint Nicholas above), a vestment decorated with an all-over pattern of crosses. Byzantine canonists’ repeated insistence on the limited number of bishops entitled to this vestment is belied by its rapid spread over the twelfth through fourteenth centuries. Perhaps to compensate, a still more privileged vestment, the sakkos, was introduced in the twelfth century, to be worn only by patriarchs and archbishops on only the most important of feast days.

    The introduction of figural embroidery on vestments, which likely occurred in Byzantium as a new phenomenon in the twelfth century, can be seen as part of this trend to differentiate the garments and insignia of the highest-ranking figures from those of lower ranks. This is not to say, of course, that the embroideries were merely a means of self-aggrandizement by the clergy; rather, they point beyond themselves to the mysteries of the liturgy as a dramatic reenactment of the life of Christ and a microcosm of the divine kingdom.

    Hanging, 18th century. Armenia. Silk, gold, and silver; brocaded; L. 97 in. (246.4 cm), W. 92 in. (233.7 cm). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Cornelius Bliss, 1942 (42.19)
    Hanging, 18th century. Armenia. Silk, gold, and silver; brocaded; L. 97 in. (246.4 cm), W. 92 in. (233.7 cm). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Cornelius Bliss, 1942 (42.19)
    Although vestments of the late Byzantine period (1261–1453) were generally decorated with embroidery on plain, unpatterned silk textiles, the post-Byzantine period saw the rise of patterned silks intended specifically for liturgical use. These seem to have been a specialty of the imperial Ottoman textile workshops at Bursa and Istanbul, and records from Moscow attest to the importation of various patterns of woven silks—many with gold and silver threads—from Ottoman Turkey to Muscovy for use in the vestments of the clergy. One such pattern, with the figure of Christ enthroned among the four symbols of the Evangelists, is known from vestments in the Kremlin in Moscow and can be viewed on a sakkos now in the collection of the Rhode Island School of Design (RISD) Museum. Like the two Ottoman textiles featured in the exhibition (below, top left and top right), its figural motifs are surrounded by crosses with the abbreviations ΙϹ ΧϹ ΝΙΚΑ, for "Jesus Christ is victorious." These patterns thus continue to adhere, centuries later, to the custom that the vestments of the clergy of highest rank should be adorned with repeating patterns of crosses. Even the Russian embroidered yoke of a phelonion (below, bottom), the design of which borrows from the stock of ornamental motifs—vines, tulips, serrated saz leaves—common among Ottoman textiles, also includes golden crosses at the centers of the silver, palmette-shaped leaves.
    Stephanos Tzangarolas (Greek, active 1688–1710). Lateral sanctuary door with Saint James the Brother of the Lord, 1688. From the Church of the Holy Trinity on Corfu. 2.03 x .81 m. Benaki Museum, Athens. (ΓΕ 3012)

    The Benaki Museum, in Athens, houses an impressive post-Byzantine icon from Corfu (left) depicting Saint James of Jerusalem. James the Adelphotheos (“Brother of God,” that is, of Jesus) was considered the first bishop of Jerusalem, and the icon shows the saint clothed in the vestments that might have been available to a well-positioned bishop in the seventeenth century. His omophorionand the lining of his phelonion imitate Italian damasks, while the outer fabric of his phelonionrecalls the repeating patterns of crosses typical of Ottoman silks woven for use in the Christian liturgy (as seen in the hanging above). His epitrachelionand epigonation, moreover, are depicted as bearing elaborate embroidery in silk and gold. The subjects depicted—priests, kings, and prophets of the Old Testament on his epitrachelion, and the entombment of Christ on his epigonation—emphasize his connection to Jerusalem, the site of Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection, and his role as a high-priestly successor to his forebears who served in the Jewish Temple.

    Although vestments of the late Byzantine period (1261–1453) were generally decorated with embroidery on plain, unpatterned silk textiles, the post-Byzantine period saw the rise of patterned silks intended specifically for liturgical use. These seem to have been a specialty of the imperial Ottoman textile workshops at Bursa and Istanbul, and records from Moscow attest to the importation of various patterns of woven silks—many with gold and silver threads—from Ottoman Turkey to Muscovy for use in the vestments of the clergy.

    One such pattern, with the figure of Christ enthroned among the four symbols of the Evangelists, is known from vestments in the Kremlin in Moscow and can be viewed on a sakkos now in the collection of the Rhode Island School of Design (RISD) Museum. Like the two Ottoman textiles featured in the exhibition (below, top left and top right), its figural motifs are surrounded by crosses with the abbreviations ΙϹ ΧϹ ΝΙΚΑ, for “Jesus Christ is victorious.” These patterns thus continue to adhere, centuries later, to the custom that the vestments of the clergy of highest rank should be adorned with repeating patterns of crosses. Even the Russian embroidered yoke of a phelonion (below, bottom), the design of which borrows from the stock of ornamental motifs—vines, tulips, serrated saz leaves—common among Ottoman textiles, also includes golden crosses at the centers of the silver, palmette-shaped leaves.

    Top left: Silk textile with seraphim and crosses, 16th–17th century. Turkey, Istanbul or Bursa. Islamic. Silk and metal-wrapped threads; lampas weave; H. 21 1/8 in. (53.7 cm), W. 24 5/8 in. (62.5 cm). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Rogers Fund, 1917 (17.22.2a–d). Top right: Silk textile with seraphim and crosses, 17th century. Ottoman Empire. Silk, lampas weave (ground in satin, pattern in twill); 43 x 22 1/2 in. (109.2 x 57.2 cm). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Rogers Fund, 1908 (08.109.16). Bottom: Yoke of a chasuble (phelonion), 17th century. Russia. Silk; embroidered in silk and metal thread with (later) metallic trim; H. 13 1/4 in. (33.7 cm), W. 32 1/4 in. (81.9 cm), D. 2 in. (with insert). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Rogers Fund, 1917 (17.157)
    Top left: Silk textile with seraphim and crosses, 16th–17th century. Turkey, Istanbul or Bursa. Islamic. Silk and metal-wrapped threads; lampas weave; H. 21 1/8 in. (53.7 cm), W. 24 5/8 in. (62.5 cm). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Rogers Fund, 1917 (17.22.2a–d). Top right: Silk textile with seraphim and crosses, 17th century. Ottoman Empire. Silk, lampas weave (ground in satin, pattern in twill); 43 x 22 1/2 in. (109.2 x 57.2 cm). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Rogers Fund, 1908 (08.109.16). Bottom: Yoke of a chasuble (phelonion), 17th century. Russia. Silk; embroidered in silk and metal thread with (later) metallic trim; H. 13 1/4 in. (33.7 cm), W. 32 1/4 in. (81.9 cm), D. 2 in. (with insert). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Rogers Fund, 1917 (17.157)

    Related Link
    Liturgical Textiles of the Post-Byzantine World, on view August 3–November 1, 2015

    Additional Reading
    Atasoy, Nurhan, Walter B. Denny, Louise W. Mackie, and Hülya Tezcan. İpek: Imperial Ottoman Silks and Velvets. London: Azimuth Editions, 2001.

    Ballian, Anna, ed. Amphia: Vestments of the Eastern Orthodox Church. Athens: Peloponnesian Folklore Foundation, 1999.

    Braun, Joseph. Die liturgische Gewandung im Occident und Orient nach Ursprung und Entwicklung, Verwendung und Symbolik. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 1907.

    Denny, Walter B., and Sumru Belger Krody. The Sultan’s Garden: The Blossoming of Ottoman Art. Washington, D.C.: The Textile Museum, 2012.

    Johnstone, Pauline. The Byzantine Tradition in Church Embroidery. Chicago: Argonaut, 1967.

    Maiasova, Nataliia Andreevna. Medieval Pictorial Embroidery: Byzantium, Balkans, Russia. Moscow: The Moscow Kremlin State Museums Publishers, 1991.

    Papastavrou, Elena. “Κεντήτριες και κεντήματα από την Κωνσταντινούπολη στις Συλλογές του ΒΧΜ.” In Ιστορία και Τέχνη, Μνήμη Δημήτρη Κωνστάντιου: Από τους κύκλους διαλέξεων του Συλλόγου Φίλων του Βυζαντινού και Χριστιανικού Μουσείου (2000–2010), 243–55. Athens: Hellenic Ministry of Culture and Sports, 2014.

    Symeon of Thessalonike. The Liturgical Commentaries. Edited by Steven Hawkes-Teeples. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 2011.

    Taft, Robert F. “The Living Icon: Touching the Transcendent in Palaiologan Iconography and Liturgy.” InByzantium: Faith and Power (1261–1557): Perspectives on Late Byzantine Art and Culture, edited by Sarah T. Brooks, 54–61. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2006.

    Theocharis, Maria. “Gold Embroidered Ornaments.” In The Holy and Great Monastery of Vatopaidi: Tradition – History – Art, vol. 2, 420–56. Mount Athos: The Monastery, 1998.

    Walter, Christopher. Art and Ritual of the Byzantine Church. London: Variorum, 1982.

    Woodfin, Warren T. The Embodied Icon: Liturgical Vestments and Sacramental Power in Byzantium. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

    ———. “Liturgical Textiles.” In Byzantium: Faith and Power (1261–1557), edited by Helen C. Evans, 295–99. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2004.

    ———. “Celestial Hierarchies and Earthly Hierarchies in the Art of the Byzantine Church.” In The Byzantine World, edited by Paul Stephenson, 303–19. Routledge: Abingdon and New York, 2010.

    Department(s): Medieval Art and The Cloisters, European Sculpture and Decorative Arts, Islamic Art
    Tag(s): Liturgical Textiles of the Post-Byzantine World, tunic, vestment
    [subscribe2]
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp Copy Link
    Previous ArticleFr. Joseph Purpura Reflects on Eventful Summer for the Dept of Youth and Parish Ministries
    Next Article Countdown to the 6th Meeting of the Assembly of Bishops – Chicago Area High School and College Students will meet with Bishops

    Related Posts

    April 30, 20251 Min Read

    Over 200 Entered the Church this Pascha in Hatfield, UK

    April 30, 202513 Mins Read

    On the Unity of the Church: An Interview with Dr. Symeon Paschalidis

    April 26, 20258 Mins Read

    The “Chernobyl Savior” Icon

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Sign the Declaration for Orthodox Christian Unity

    Enter the Slogan Contest

    Share this page
    DISCLAIMER

    All articles represent the views of the authors and  not necessarily the official views of Orthodox Christian Laity (OCL). They are posted to encourage thoughtful discussion on topics and concerns relevant to Orthodox Christians living in a pluralistic society. OCL encourages your comments.

    Stay Informed!

    Subscribe to our Newsletter

    WE WELCOME YOUR INPUT AND SUPPORT!

    Your donation impacts and helps advance the unity of the Orthodox Church of America.

    DONATE NOW

    THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONTINUED SUPPORT!

    Upcoming Events
    There are no upcoming events.
    Recent Comments
    • Webmaster on St Catherine’s Circle: Lenten Lectures on Tuesdays at 2:00 pm Eastern
    • Joy smith on St Catherine’s Circle: Lenten Lectures on Tuesdays at 2:00 pm Eastern
    • Webmaster on Ethiopian Bible is the oldest and complete bible on earth
    • Gloria on Ethiopian Bible is the oldest and complete bible on earth
    • Webmaster on A Different Kind of Pope – Analysis by Theodore Kalmoukos
    • Irvinjacksonjr on Ethiopian Bible is the oldest and complete bible on earth
    • George Marakis on A Response to “Xenophobia in the Cloak of Progress How English Liturgies Hurt the American Orthodox Church”
    • Gerry Perdilas on A Response to “Xenophobia in the Cloak of Progress How English Liturgies Hurt the American Orthodox Church”
    • Lakis Velotris on Is Trump the New Constantine?
    • Mary Zaras on Is Trump the New Constantine?
    OCL Archives Online
    Project for Orthodox Renewal
    renewal-resize
    OCL Digital Newsletter

    Subscribe to our Newsletter

    MAKE A DONATION

    St. Symeon the New Theologian and St. Photini are the Patron Saints of OCL

    footer-fnl

    Orthodox Christian Laity
    PO Box 6954

    West Palm Beach, FL · 33405
    561-585-0245

    Sponsored by Ann Souvall in memory of husband George

    DISCLAIMER: All articles represent the views of the authors and  not necessarily the official views of Orthodox Christian Laity (OCL). They are posted to encourage thoughtful discussion on topics and concerns relevant to Orthodox Christians living in a pluralistic society. OCL encourages your comments.

    ©2025 Orthodox Christian Laity (OCL) ·  Login

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.