Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Ecumenical Patriarchate Issues Statement on Status of Saint Catherine Monastery of Sinai
    • Council of Nicaea anniversary is call to Christian unity, speakers say
    • Call for Nominations: 2025 Medal of Saint Theodora Award
    • Save the Date: October 11, 2025 – Frederica Mathewes-Green to Headline OCL’s 38th Annual Conference
    • Metropolitan Elder Dimitrios of the Princes’ Islands Named Honorary Doctor in Athens
    • Fordham’s Orthodox Christian Studies Center Annual Benefit Reception on June 16
    • Saint-Sophia-Seminary-Quarterly-No. 2
    • Merger creates new Christ the Savior Greek Orthodox Church in Bluff City
    Orthodox Christian Laity
    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube
    • Home
    • OCL
      • About OCL
      • Leadership
      • OCL News
      • OCL Publications
      • Focused Study and Research Topics
      • OCL Archives at DePaul University
    • Orthodox News & Links
      • Orthodox News Stories
      • Headlines & News Archives
      • Governance & Unity
        • Governance Top Stories
        • Governance & Unity Essays
        • Grassroots Unity in Action
      • OCL Forums
      • Orthodox Christian Laity News
      • Web Links
    • Audio & Video
      • Audio Index
      • Video Index
    • Contact
    • Make a Donation
    Orthodox Christian Laity
    You are at:Home»Governance & Unity News»Governance & Unity Essays»Does the Charter of the Archdiocese of America need to be amended?

    Does the Charter of the Archdiocese of America need to be amended?

    1
    By Webmaster on June 3, 2023 Governance & Unity Essays, Governance & Unity News
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Telegram WhatsApp Copy Link

    Source: EXAPSALMOS

    By Dr. Anastasiou Vavouskou/ NATIONAL HERMIT

    Anastasios Vavouskos, Doctor of Ecclesiastical Law of the School of Law A.P.Th. Lawyer Archon Asikretis of the Ecumenical Patriarchate. PHOTO COURTESY OF SAME

    Dr. Anastasios Vavouskos, Doctor of Ecclesiastical Law of the School of Law of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki and of Archon Asikrites of M.t.CHE, with his article “intervention” in the “National Herald”, analyzes the issue of the amendment of the Statute of the Archdiocese of America .

    Mr. Vavouskos’ article reads as follows:

    For some time now, the issue of revising the Charter of the Archdiocese of America has been pending. Much has been written and even more has been heard about the probable tendencies and opinions of either the Ecumenical Patriarch and the members of the Holy Synod of the Ecumenical Patriarchate or the Archbishop of America, the Metropolitans of the Archdiocese and the laity who participate in the mixed bodies of this administration.

    I will not hesitate to tell you that in my letter to His Holiness I placed myself at the disposal of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, wishing to contribute to the successful handling of the issue. And this, because I had – and still have – a clear opinion both about whether or not the Charter of the Archdiocese of America needs revision and about the procedure that should be followed anyway for this specific issue.

    This point of view, therefore, I will present immediately below, since I have the privilege of not being actively involved in the process of discussions on the issue under consideration.

    Well, for those familiar with the Common Law settings:

    a) on the functioning of the synodal system

    b) on the authority of the bishop

    c) on the rights and obligations of the President of the Synod

    d) on principles of normal jurisdiction

    e) on ecclesiastical justice

    f) on the subordination of monasteries to the local bishop

    g) on ​​regional bishops (compared to the institution of the Assistant Bishop)

    h) about Exarchus

    i) on witnessing

    the answer to the question, if the Charter of the Archdiocese of America needs to be amended, would be categorically negative.

    The aforementioned Charter is complete and despite its twenty-year validity, it has not lost its relevance, i.e. it has not been overtaken by social, technological and other developments.

    The only change, which must definitely be made in the Charter, is the abolition of the – apparently by mistake – incorrect term “person of legal law” (see for example article 3), which does not exist in the science of Law, and its replacement with the correct term “legal entity”.

    Further, the legal categorization of the entities of the Archdiocese of America (Holy Metropolitans, Holy Monasteries, etc.) could perhaps be re-examined in relation to the legal, tax and accounting regime in the United States of America, so that it is certain, that the above entities actually enjoy all the rights of Non-Profit Corporations. And in the event that it is established that there is full coverage, it is fine. In case, however, there were legislative developments on the part of the State (USA) after the new Charter of 2003, then the corresponding modernization of the latter should also take place. In short, because in terms of Common Law there is in my view no problem, the only issue, which – always in my opinion – should be examined, is whether the Charter Charter of the Archdiocese of America is in line with the State (by State) and also the federal legislation of the state of the USA. on the status of Non-Profit Legal Entities, a status which implies tax reliefs and different – ​​to the benefit of these legal entities – treatment.

    All of the above, of course, on the condition that the current statutory status of the Archdiocese of America’s affiliation to the Ecumenical Patriarchate, as described in the Charter, is not disputed by any side. And of course, when I say “it is not disputed by any side”, I am not referring either to the Ecumenical Patriarchate, because its position on the matter is self-evident and unwavering, nor certainly to the Archpriests of the Archdiocese of America, who already have an expressed opinion.

    In conclusion, the whole issue, in my opinion, was created without reason and without reason still remains pending. And not only that, but also the entire procedural method of resolving it is based on a wrong foundation.

    However, at the point where things have reached, even after the formation of a special bilateral Committee, the only way out – and in accordance with article 25 of the Charter of the Archdiocese of America – for the solution and termination of the matter, is the following:

    First of all, it should be based on article 5 prgp. a’ of the Charter, to convene the Holy Synod of the Archdiocese of America on the subject of “Amendment of the Charter of the Archdiocese of America”. The extraordinary convocation takes place:

    a) or upon the initiative of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, in which case the convocation is mandatory.

    b) either at the initiative of the Archbishop of America

    c) either upon the initiative of the majority of the members of the Holy Synod.

    Afterwards, the Holy Synod of the Archdiocese of America will discuss the issue and decide in the first phase, whether it wishes to amend its Charter or not.

    If the Holy Synod opposes the amendment, then the matter stops there. In this case, there is no need to ask the Archbishop’s Council and the Archbishop’s Clergy Lay Assembly according to article 25 of the Charter, because the application of this article requires a positive suggestion for amendment and not a lack of suggestion due to rejection of the idea of ​​amendment.

    If, however, it decides in favor of the amendment, then a special Committee is set up, which will submit to the Holy Synod of the Archdiocese of America a Plan for amending the Charter. This Plan, after a relevant decision of the Holy Synod of the Archdiocese of America, will take the form of the Recommendation, which will include the provisions that must be amended, the texts of the new – amended provisions and a statement of reasons for each amended provision.

    When this process is completed, the prepared Proposal will be submitted in accordance with article 25 of the Charter to the Archdiocesan Council and the Archdiocesan Clergy Assembly in order, and then the final Proposal will be submitted to the Ecumenical Patriarchate, which will approve, reject or will modify the submitted proposal.

    With the issuance of the decision of the Holy Synod of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, the amendment process is completed, lawfully and normally.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp Copy Link
    Previous ArticleHelp publish an SVS Press book
    Next Article OCA Departments Release “Essential Orthodox Christian Beliefs” (REVISED)

    Related Posts

    June 10, 20254 Mins Read

    Ecumenical Patriarchate Issues Statement on Status of Saint Catherine Monastery of Sinai

    June 5, 20256 Mins Read

    Council of Nicaea anniversary is call to Christian unity, speakers say

    June 2, 20252 Mins Read

    Call for Nominations: 2025 Medal of Saint Theodora Award

    1 Comment

    1. Cato the Elder on June 5, 2023 4:02 pm

      Who is Mr. Vavouskos?

      Is he the self-described neutral commentator who has the “privilege of not being actively involved in the process of discussions on the issue” of the Charter?

      Or, is he the “lawyer Archon Asikretis of the Ecumenical Patriarchate”?

      Since he has now imposed himself into the conversation of the Charter that was imposed, suspended and then reinstated by the Ecumenical Patriarchate his high station requires that attention be paid, even fleetingly, to what he has to say. He answers his own question: “Does the Charter need to be amended” by answering: “categorically negative.” That would seem to be the end of the discussion.

      But, no.. what follows is a bunch of mind-numbing legal mumbo-jumbo that is supposed to impress everyone with the erudition of the author.. until we finally get to his real intention in submitting his treatise to: EXPSALMOS, National Hermit, and The National Herald:

      At the end of his long-winded description of procedures, processes, regulations, Councils and Congresses (that are rarely followed) he concludes as follows:

      “When the process is concluded, the final proposal will be submitted to the Ecumenical Patriarchate which will approve, reject or will modify the submitted proposal. With the issuance of the decision of the Holy Synod of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, the amendment process is completed, lawfully and normally.”

      So, for those who haven’t been razzle-dazzled by all the legal jargon, Mr. Vavouskos is basically saying that the Charter is a “gift” from the Ecumenical Patriarchate to the Archdiocese of America and that it will contain whatever the Ecumenical Patriarchate wants it to contain.

      All the procedures, processes, committees, Parish Councils, Archdiocesan Councils, Metropolis Assemblies, Clergy-Laity Congresses, etc., are distractions intended to give the appearance of local input, but at the end of the day, they are meaningless.

      I cannot imagine a better argument for the Orthodox Church in North America to be united and Autocephalous than what Mr. Vavouskos has presented to the faithful in America.

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Sign the Declaration for Orthodox Christian Unity

    Enter the Slogan Contest

    Share this page
    DISCLAIMER

    All articles represent the views of the authors and  not necessarily the official views of Orthodox Christian Laity (OCL). They are posted to encourage thoughtful discussion on topics and concerns relevant to Orthodox Christians living in a pluralistic society. OCL encourages your comments.

    Stay Informed!

    Subscribe to our Newsletter

    WE WELCOME YOUR INPUT AND SUPPORT!

    Your donation impacts and helps advance the unity of the Orthodox Church of America.

    DONATE NOW

    THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONTINUED SUPPORT!

    Upcoming Events
    There are no upcoming events.
    Recent Comments
    • Procopius on Leading Liturgists Reaffirm the Ordination of Women to the Diaconate
    • Procopius on How will the Female Diaconate Help Prevent Abuse?
    • John Fronime on Archbishop Elpidophoros Proposes Separation of Church and State in Greece
    • Nn on HAVE WE HIT ROCK BOTTOM? REFLECTIONS OF A NOT-SO-INNOCENT BYSTANDER [witnessing the present decline of the Orthodox Church as an institution]
    • Member on Ex-Clergyman, Sexually Abused at 17 by His Priest, Attempted Suicide
    • Bonnie Belknap on Archbishop Elpidophoros Proposes Separation of Church and State in Greece
    • Bonnie Belknap on Archbishop Elpidophoros Proposes Separation of Church and State in Greece
    • Bonnie Belknap on Archbishop Elpidophoros Proposes Separation of Church and State in Greece
    • Luke on Egypt nationalizes ancient monastery’s grounds, fraying ties between Athens and Cairo
    • Webmaster on Egypt nationalizes ancient monastery’s grounds, fraying ties between Athens and Cairo
    OCL Archives Online
    Project for Orthodox Renewal
    renewal-resize
    OCL Digital Newsletter

    Subscribe to our Newsletter

    MAKE A DONATION

    St. Symeon the New Theologian and St. Photini are the Patron Saints of OCL

    footer-fnl

    Orthodox Christian Laity
    PO Box 6954

    West Palm Beach, FL · 33405
    561-585-0245

    Sponsored by Ann Souvall in memory of husband George

    DISCLAIMER: All articles represent the views of the authors and  not necessarily the official views of Orthodox Christian Laity (OCL). They are posted to encourage thoughtful discussion on topics and concerns relevant to Orthodox Christians living in a pluralistic society. OCL encourages your comments.

    ©2025 Orthodox Christian Laity (OCL) ·  Login

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.