Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • The Witness and the Service of Eastern Orthodoxy to the One Undivided Church
    • GOA 48th Biennial Clergy Laity Congress Reports
    • Assembly of Bishops Appoint July 26, 2026 as Prison Ministry Awareness Sunday
    • Statement on the Occasion of the 250th Anniversary of the United States of America
    • The Patriarchate of Antioch’s Antiochian Global Reach Project
    • From the World Cup to the Orthodox Church—US Soccer Star Desmond Armstrong on his Life & Faith
    • The First, Second, and Third Rome – in Paris
    • Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew urges absent churches to accept Holy and Great Council decrees
    Orthodox Christian Laity
    Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube
    • Home
    • OCL
      • About OCL
      • Leadership
      • OCL News
      • OCL Publications
      • Focused Study and Research Topics
      • OCL Archives at DePaul University
    • Orthodox News & Links
      • Orthodox News Stories
      • Headlines & News Archives
      • Governance & Unity
        • Governance Top Stories
        • Governance & Unity Commentary
        • Grassroots Unity in Action
      • OCL Forums
      • Orthodox Christian Laity News
      • Web Links
    • Audio & Video
      • Audio Index
      • Video Index
    • Contact
    • Make a Donation
    Orthodox Christian Laity
    You are at:Home»Orthodox News»CLOSED COMMUNION

    CLOSED COMMUNION

    3
    By Webmaster on May 28, 2015 Orthodox News, Orthodox News Top Stories
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Telegram WhatsApp Copy Link

    Archdiocese of Thyateira and Great Britain photoSource: Archdiocese of Thyateira and Great Britain

    by Ilias Levy

    People who are interested in knowing more about the Orthodox Church frequently ask about the practice of closed communion – that is, allowing only Orthodox Christians to receive Holy Communion in our churches.

    To some Orthodox it may seem that this is a somewhat bizarre issue to think worthy of an article. Indeed, perhaps it ought to be. Unfortunately, however, it is something about which there appears to be a certain amount of ignorance and confusion – to the extent where there have been very troubling instances of non-Orthodox being given Communion in Britain and other places. Where this happens, it is of course a disciplinary issue which must be dealt with by the appropriate Hierarchs. However it is also true that for some people it is an issue which is very difficult to understand – and from this lack of understanding can come an understandable pastoral difficulty when people are told that, for instance, a Catholic or Protestant spouse or friend cannot be admitted to Communion.

    It is therefore my intention to try to make this subject more widely understood and, hopefully, by increasing knowledge and understanding, removing the potential for insult or offence.

    Part of the reason for this confusion is that other Christian denominations allow any Christian (and, occasionally, anyone at all) to receive the Precious Gifts. Whether this is in fact true is something to which I will come later. Indeed, it seems more likely that the reason is simply that there is a lack of knowledge about the significance of Communion. This Mystery is not a cause of unity, rather a result of it.

    The act of receiving Communion is not something which brings someone into unity with the Church. In fact, the most serious penalty which the Church can put on its members is that of excommunication – refusing to allow an individual to receive the Gifts. This shows not only the importance of the Eucharist for Orthodox Christians, but also the fact that one must be a faithful member of the Church to take part in the Mystery.

    The most significant reason for keeping a practice of closed communion is that it is vitally necessary for a communicant to have a correct understanding of the Holy Mystery from which he is partaking. As A.S. Frangopoulos explains in his book ‘Our Orthodox Christian Faith’, other Christians have an alternate – and therefore incorrect – understanding of the Eucharist. How, then, would it be at all reasonable to invite them to share, as Frangopoulos puts it, a common cup? This difference is most keenly felt when it comes to the vast majority of Protestant denominations. The Orthodox doctrine is that the bread and wine used in the Eucharist truly become the Most Precious Body and Blood of our Saviour. Most Protestants, on the other hand, tend to see this as purely a symbolic matter, choosing to concentrate on the words of Christ – “Do this in remembrance of me”. This line is, of course, only a very small part of Christ’s institution of the Eucharist.

    In the account of the Last Supper in the Gospel of St John, Christ tells us that this sacrament is for the unity of the faith, that His disciples might be one. How, then, can we share this most sacred of Mysteries with those with whom we have no unity? A (rather strange, it must be said) response to this might be that “well, we are all Christians”. Only in the most basic of senses, this may be true. But we, as Orthodox Christians, believe that the Orthodox Church holds, uniquely, the fullness of truth. It carries the traditions and faith of the Apostles, and therefore springs from the salvific teaching of Christ Himself. Any theological deviation from this faith is, by definition, lacking in truth.

    Another scriptural justification for the practice of closed communion comes from St Paul’s first letter to the Corinthians – “So then, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord.”

    One of the reasons that this is apparently such a difficult issue in our modern, Western, society is the rise of the oppressive atmosphere of pluralism. This doctrine attempts to teach us that all opinions, beliefs and ideas are equally valid, and that it is in some sense morally wrong to question anyone else’s views or to promote a known truth of your own. Of course, as Orthodox Christians we know that this simply cannot work. There can be no such thing as a pluralist Orthodoxy. This does not, of course, mean that we should be judgmental, prejudicial or condemnatory. We are clearly commanded in the Gospel to love our neighbours, and even our enemies. It is sometimes a difficult balance to achieve, but we are extremely fortunate that we have two millennia of Church Tradition and wisdom to draw upon.

    Finally, I would like to quote an extract from an online article on this subject – “It is crucial to point out that the Orthodox practice of “closed” communion is not a judgment against a person or their standing in God’s eyes or the potential of their salvation. It is not a way of saying that some are “good” and others are “bad”. The practice of receiving communion together is the outward expression of having all things in common, in faith and worship. It is the fruit of unity.”

    Editor’s Note (Theological Discussion)

    This article presents theological reflection and discussion intended to encourage informed dialogue within the Orthodox Church. Its inclusion does not imply formal endorsement of every conclusion but reflects OCL’s long‑standing commitment to thoughtful engagement with issues affecting the life of the Church.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp Copy Link
    Previous ArticleEcclesiology and Nationalism in the Postmodern Era
    Next Article MOSCOW PATRIARCHATE: CHINA AUTHORIZES THE ORDINATION OF CHINESE ORTHODOX PRIESTS ON ITS TERRITORY

    Related Posts

    July 7, 20263 Mins Read

    Assembly of Bishops Appoint July 26, 2026 as Prison Ministry Awareness Sunday

    July 1, 20261 Min Read

    From the World Cup to the Orthodox Church—US Soccer Star Desmond Armstrong on his Life & Faith

    June 20, 20263 Mins Read

    Greek Orthodox Patriarchate Condemns Israel Over Church Land Seizure in Jerusalem

    3 Comments

    1. George D. Karcazes on May 29, 2015 7:31 pm

      The use of the term “closed” communion may be part of the problem. Understanding “communion” as the visible, physical sign that those receiving the gifts consecrated during the liturgy are “in communion” with each other should make it easier to understand. Those receiving are professing that they are all part of the same community of believers.. that they believe the same things.. and do not believe some of the things that those who are not “in communion” with them believe. Putting aside the doctrinal and theological difference we have with Protestants, it is helpful to remember that when the Eastern Church and the Church of Rome separated (by exchanging documents of “excommunication”) they were basically saying: “We no longer believe the same things”. The ongoing dialogues to re-unite the two Churches involve removing the differences between what each believes, so that they can become one community of believers once more. When that happens ,we will be “in communion” with each other.

      Based on statements from Pope Francis and Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, there seems to be an increasing urgency for that to happen. Perhaps the scheduled “Great and Holy Council” of the Orthodox Churches in 2016 is an attempt to get the Orthodox Churches house in order in order to be able to move forward. The Chambessy documents empowered Assemblies of Bishops around the world to submit plans for their territorial churches to become “in canonical order”. Patriarch Bartholomew called on the US Assembly of Bishops to stop talking about “what is mine, and what is yours, and agree on what is ours.” Based on the recent findings of the Pew Research Center about the Churches in America, the bishops are running out of time.

      Reply
    2. Fr. Basil Papanikolaou on May 30, 2015 11:31 am

      Here we have one of the “thorniest” theological subjects (topics), debated not only in Interfaith dialogues, also among Orthodox “dogmatists.” The question is what we exactly mean by the so called transubstantiation, i.e., faith in “real” or “symbolic” presence. What does “real” mean, something like a “chemical” change or change by faith? If by “faith,” then can we say that faith is expressed through “symbols?”

      Reply
    3. George Hippolakis on June 1, 2015 9:41 am

      The Scriptures tell us that the Holy Spirit dwells where there is “TRUTH AND LOVE.” If we are in communion with God and each other, it will be within this criteria. We do not know if the Holy Spirit dwells where there is “half-truth” and certainly not where people believe and practice lies. How can we Orthodox be in Holy Communion where truth and love doesn’t exist?

      Furthermore, “transubstantiation” is not a problem or issue for Orthodox; this is a Roman Catholic philosophical idea. When we partake of the Body & Blood of Christ, this is the “RISEN” Body & Blood of Christ that is, a Spiritual Body. It has no physical properties of this world. The Eucharist is real bread & wine and the real Body & Blood of the risen Christ.

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Declaration for Orthodox Unity – click here…

    A quote from a homily by St. Nikolai Velimirovich on Orthodoxy in America

    “The time may not be far off when there will be a united Orthodox Church in America, which will include all the present Eastern national Churches in this country, a Church with one central administrative authority. I see a tendency toward such an end in each of our now individual Churches. … And when by God’s Providence the time is ripe for the accomplishment of such a unity, I dare not doubt that the venerable heads of all our Orthodox Churches in Europe, Asia, and Africa, always led by the Holy Spirit, will give their blessing for the organization of a new and autonomous sister Church in America.”

    DONATE NOW

    Subscribe to our Newsletter

    Sign the Declaration for Orthodox Christian Unity

    Enter the Slogan Contest

    Recent Comments
    • on Ethiopian Bible is the oldest and complete bible on earth
      The Ethiopian bible is not the oldest bible by a long shot. It was not completed until the 14th century...
    • on The Earliest Known Prayer to the Theotokos
      When originally published, the claim was that P470 was not earlier than the 350's A.D. One scholar (Lobel) did think...
    • on NEW STRATEGY NEEDED TO SAVE ENDANGERED ECUMENICAL PATRIARCHATE
      If the Patriarch leaves Constantinople, Russia will assume primacy. This has been the goal of the Third Romists even before...
    • on The Trail of the Tithe
      This article presents a thoughtful and well-researched examination of the historical development of tithing. The clear organization, careful use of...
    • on NEW STRATEGY NEEDED TO SAVE ENDANGERED ECUMENICAL PATRIARCHATE
      The essay by Peter Marudas is relevant today and should be part of the process of assessing the state of...
    DISCLAIMER

    All articles represent the views of the authors and  not necessarily the official views of Orthodox Christian Laity (OCL). They are posted to encourage thoughtful discussion on topics and concerns relevant to Orthodox Christians living in a pluralistic society. OCL encourages your comments.

    Upcoming Events
    Notice
    There are no upcoming events.
    OCL Archives Online

    Click here or on the OCL logo

    St. Symeon the New Theologian and St. Photini are the Patron Saints of OCL

    footer-fnl

    Orthodox Christian Laity
    PO Box 6954

    West Palm Beach, FL · 33405
    561-585-0245

    ocladmin@ocl.org (or) orthodoxchristianlaity@gmail.com

    Sponsored by Ann Souvall in memory of husband George

    DISCLAIMER: All articles represent the views of the authors and  not necessarily the official views of Orthodox Christian Laity (OCL). They are posted to encourage thoughtful discussion on topics and concerns relevant to Orthodox Christians living in a pluralistic society. OCL encourages your comments.

    ©2026 Orthodox Christian Laity (OCL) ·  Login

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.